|
首页 >> 论文投稿 >> 查看话题

ACS AMI 返回审稿意见,一个拒,一个小修,编辑给的大修,该怎么改

xjb1991 举报此信息
第一个人好像说我的文章不适合在这个杂志上发表,偏工程化不是做研究;第二个审稿人给的小修,提了三个建议;最后编辑给的大修。我想请教各位这种情况如何修改啊,第一个审稿人应该怎么去回复他呢?
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Not appropriate for ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
Comments:
The manuscript reports on the fabrication of a miniaturized thermite application.
The work is carried out well, and the system is well characterized.
However, in my view the work is too specialized for this type of journal.
In my opinion, it should be submitted to an engineering-type publication.
The final decision is up to the editor, however.
Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions noted.
用户评论